Short-term natural history in women with symptoms indicative of pelvic organ prolapse

Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Apr;22(4):461-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1305-z. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Information about the natural history of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is scarce.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of 160 women (mean age 56 years), whose answers in a population-based survey investigation indicated presence of symptomatic prolapse (siPOP), and 120 women without siPOP (mean age 51 years).

Results: Follow-up questionnaire was completed by 87%, and 67% underwent re-examination according to pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system after 5 years. Among re-examining siPOP women, 47% had an unchanged POP-Q stage, 40% showed regression, and 13% showed progression. The key symptom "feeling of a vaginal bulge" remained unchanged in 30% of women with siPOP, 64% improved by at least one step on our four-step rating scale, and 6% deteriorated. Among control women, siPOP developed in 2%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between changes in anatomic status and changes in investigated symptoms.

Conclusion: Only a small proportion of women with symptomatic POP get worse within 5 years.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Pelvic Floor / pathology
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse / epidemiology*
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse / etiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Sweden / epidemiology