[Two-stage revision for treatment of periprosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty]

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011 Apr;31(4):690-3.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and optimal re-implantation time of two-stage revision for management of periprosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 15 patients (15 hip joints) undergoing two-stage ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision from January, 2006 to January, 2010. In the first stage, after surgical debridement and thorough removal of all the implants, a self-made Vancomycin-loaded cement spacer was implanted. The second stage operation was performed 3-6 months later for debridement and removal of the antibiotic-loaded spacer, followed by re-implantation of Vancomycin-loaded bone cement prosthesis in 9 cases and cementless prosthesis in 6 cases. The patients were followed up for 9-46 months (mean 25 months) after the operation.

Results: No reinfection or prosthesis loosening/displacement was found in these cases after the operation. The Harris score increased from 40.3 before the operation to 54.0 after the first-stage operation, and to 88.2 at the last follow-up.

Conclusion: Two-stage revision is effective for treatment of periprosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty, and 3-6 months can be the optimal interval between the two the first-stage and second-stage operation for re-implantation.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Female
  • Hip Prosthesis
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / surgery*
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome