[A pilot study for handling errors in psychotherapy - therapists report from practical experience]

Psychiatr Prax. 2012 Oct;39(7):326-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1305192. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Objective: To assess the views of psychotherapists regarding management of treatment errors by reviewing and analyzing interviews with therapists.

Methods: A literature search was used to identify topics for the interview guide. Semi-structured interviews with 30 psychotherapists were conducted and analyzed according to qualitative content analysis, a framework approach.

Results: Psychotherapists report an open approach to handling treatment errors: the majority claim that they would discuss errors with their patients. Experiences with error disclosure were on the whole rather positive. Errors of colleagues would be discussed in a supervisory way or, in more serious cases, be reported.

Conclusion: In psychotherapy, a constructive and open handling of errors seems to prevail. Therapists tend to be cautious when judging errors of colleagues.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Berlin
  • Communication
  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Diagnostic Errors / ethics*
  • Ethics, Medical*
  • Humans
  • Interdisciplinary Communication
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Mental Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Mental Disorders / therapy*
  • Patient Safety
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Pilot Projects
  • Psychotherapy / ethics*
  • Treatment Failure*