Radiological criteria for acceptable reduction of extra-articular distal radial fractures are not predictive for patient-reported functional outcome

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Jun;38(5):524-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193412468266. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the association between arm-specific disability measured with the QuickDASH questionaire and radiological criteria in patients with extra-articular distal radial fractures. A consecutive series of 385 patients were initially treated non-operatively for an extra-articular distal radial fracture and 257 (69 %) patients were included in the study. In 203 of these patients (78%) the quality of radiographic reduction was judged to be adequate by radiological parameters, which included dorsal tilt, radial inclination, and radial shortening. In 54 patients (22%) the quality of radiographic alignment was judged to be inadequate. We observed no effect of radiographic parameters on the functional outcome. Female sex and longer duration of follow-up (>35 months) were the only independent prognostic factors significantly associated with a worse QuickDASH score.

Keywords: Distal radial fracture; functional outcome; non-operative treatment; operative treatment; radiological parameters; reduction.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Female
  • Fracture Healing
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Radiography
  • Radius Fractures / diagnostic imaging*
  • Radius Fractures / therapy*
  • Recovery of Function
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires