The Short Form 36 English and Chinese versions were equivalent in a multiethnic Asian population

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this article was to evaluate measurement equivalence of the English and Chinese versions of the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) and Short Form 6D (SF-6D).

Study design and setting: In this cross-sectional study, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured from 4,973 ethnic Chinese subjects using the SF-36v2 questionnaire. Measurement equivalence of domain and utility scores for the English- and Chinese-language SF-36v2 and SF-6D were assessed by examining the score differences between the two languages using linear regression models, with and without adjustment for known determinants of HRQoL. Equivalence was achieved if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the differences in scores, due to language, fell within a predefined equivalence margin.

Results: Compared with English-speaking Chinese, Chinese-speaking Chinese were significantly older (47.6 vs. 55.5 years). All SF-36v2 domains were equivalent after adjusting for known HRQoL. SF-6D utility/items had the 90% CI either fully or partially overlap their predefined equivalence margin.

Conclusion: The English- and Chinese-language versions of the SF-36v2 and SF-6D demonstrated equivalence.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Algorithms
  • Asian People / ethnology*
  • China
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • England
  • Female
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Language*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Factors
  • Singapore / epidemiology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires