Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent cellulitis of the leg: economic analysis of the PATCH I & II trials

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 14;9(2):e82694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082694. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background: Cellulitis (erysipelas) is a recurring and debilitating bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissue. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic treatment to prevent the recurrence of cellulitis using low dose penicillin V in patients following a first episode (6 months prophylaxis) and more recurrent cellulitis (12 months prophylaxis, or 6 months in those declining 12 months).

Methods: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the findings of two randomised placebo-controlled multicentre trials (PATCH I and PATCH II), in which patients recruited in the UK and Ireland were followed-up for up to 3 years. Incremental cost, reduction in recurrence, cost per recurrence prevented and cost/QALY were estimated. National unit and reference costs for England in 2010 were applied to resource use, exploring NHS and societal perspectives. A total of 397 patients from the two trials contributed to the analysis.

Results: There was a 29% reduction in the number of recurrences occurring within the trial (IRR: 0.71 95%CI: 0.53 to 0.90, p = 0.02), corresponding to an absolute reduction of recurrence of 0.31 recurrences/patient (95%CI: 0.05 to 0.59, p = 0.02). Incremental costs of prophylaxis suggested a small cost saving but were not statistically significant, comparing the two groups. If a decision-maker is willing to pay up to £25,000/QALY then there is a 66% probability of antibiotic prophylaxis being cost-effective from an NHS perspective, rising to 76% probability from a secondary, societal perspective.

Conclusion: Following first episode or recurrent cellulitis of the leg, prophylactic low dose penicillin is a very low cost intervention which, on balance, is effective and cost-effective at preventing subsequent attacks. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces cellulitis recurrence by nearly a third but is not associated with a significant increase in costs.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / economics*
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis / economics*
  • Cellulitis / drug therapy*
  • Cellulitis / economics
  • Cellulitis / prevention & control*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leg / pathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents

Grants and funding

PATCH I was funded by Action Medical Research; PATCH II was funded by the Bupa Foundation. Neither funder had any role in the study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of this report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.