[Validity and concordance of electronic health records in primary care (AP-Madrid) for surveillance of diabetes mellitus. PREDIMERC study]

Gac Sanit. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):393-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity and concordance of diabetes data in the electronic health records of primary care (Madrid-PC) by comparing with those from the PREDIMERC study.

Methods: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and kappa index of diabetes cases recorded in the health records of Madrid-PC were calculated by using data from PREDIMERC as the gold standard. The prevalence of diabetes was also determined according to each data source.

Results: The sensitivity of diabetes recorded in Madrid-PC was 74%, the specificity was 98.8%, the positive predictive value was 87.9%, the negative predictive value was 97.3%, and the kappa index was 0.78. The prevalence of diabetes recorded in Madrid-PC was 6.7% versus 8.1% by PREDIMERC, where known diabetes was 6.3%.

Conclusions: The electronic health records of primary care are a valid source for epidemiological surveillance of diabetes in Madrid.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Electronic health records; Epidemiology; Epidemiología; Historia clínica electrónica; Public health surveillance; Sensibilidad y especificidad; Sensitivity and specificity; Vigilancia epidemiológica.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diabetes Mellitus* / epidemiology
  • Electronic Health Records / statistics & numerical data*
  • Epidemiological Monitoring
  • Humans
  • Prevalence
  • Primary Health Care*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires