Identification of abnormal screening mammogram interpretation using Medicare claims data

Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):290-304. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12194. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate Medicare claims-based approaches for identifying abnormal screening mammography interpretation.

Data sources: Mammography data and linked Medicare claims for 387,709 mammograms performed from 1999 to 2005 within the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC).

Study design: Split-sample validation of algorithms based on claims for breast imaging or biopsy following screening mammography.

Data extraction methods: Medicare claims and BCSC mammography data were pooled at a central Statistical Coordinating Center.

Principal findings: Presence of claims for subsequent imaging or biopsy had sensitivity of 74.9 percent (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 74.1-75.6) and specificity of 99.4 percent (95 percent CI, 99.4-99.5). A classification and regression tree improved sensitivity to 82.5 percent (95 percent CI, 81.9-83.2) but decreased specificity (96.6 percent, 95 percent CI, 96.6-96.8).

Conclusions: Medicare claims may be a feasible data source for research or quality improvement efforts addressing high rates of abnormal screening mammography.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Medicare; mammography; quality assessment; screening.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Algorithms
  • Biopsy
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Diagnostic Errors
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Insurance Claim Review*
  • Mammography*
  • Medicare*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • United States