Efficacy and safety of rioprostil, 300 micrograms b.d., in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a double-blind, controlled multicentre clinical study vs. ranitidine

Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1989:164:198-205; discussion 205-6. doi: 10.3109/00365528909091213.

Abstract

This study is undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rioprostil, 300 micrograms, compared with ranitidine, 150 mg, when given twice daily for 4-6 weeks to patients with active, uncomplicated duodenal ulcer. The effects of each drug on ulcer healing are evaluated by endoscopy. Of a total of 355 patients who have entered this study, 319 are statistically evaluated for efficacy; 162 receive rioprostil and 157 receive ranitidine. After 4 weeks of treatment, 63% of the patients receiving rioprostil are endoscopically healed, compared with 72% of those receiving ranitidine. After 6 weeks of treatment, the cumulative healing rates are 86% and 93.5% respectively; this difference is statistically significant. Diarrhoea is the main adverse event, but is generally mild and self-limiting. These results indicate that rioprostil, 300 micrograms b.d., is a safe and effective treatment for duodenal ulcer, but is slightly less effective than ranitidine, 150 mg b.d.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anti-Ulcer Agents / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Ulcer Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Duodenal Ulcer / drug therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Prostaglandins E / administration & dosage
  • Prostaglandins E / therapeutic use*
  • Prostaglandins, Synthetic / therapeutic use
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Ranitidine / administration & dosage
  • Ranitidine / therapeutic use*
  • Rioprostil

Substances

  • Anti-Ulcer Agents
  • Prostaglandins E
  • Prostaglandins, Synthetic
  • Rioprostil
  • Ranitidine