Prevena™, negative pressure wound therapy applied to closed Pfannenstiel incisions at time of caesarean section in patients deemed at high risk for wound infection

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Apr;35(3):255-8. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2014.958442. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

Abstract

The aim of our retrospective study is to report on our experience using the Prevena™ wound system in obese patients undergoing caesarean section delivery. A total of 26 cases were identified from July 2012 to October 2013. The median BMI of these women was 45.3 kg/m(2). Elective caesarean sections were performed in 20 women (77%). There were four cases (15%) of superficial dehiscence. Factors associated with wound breakdown were wound infection (p = 0.03), increasing BMI (p < 0.001) and emergency LSCS (p = 0.04). In a logistic regression model the presence of infection was the only factor which remained associated with wound breakdown. Wound disruption is a major cause of morbidity following caesarean section in morbidly obese patients. The wound complication rate in our experience was low with the Prevena™ dressing with no cases of sheath dehiscence, and no patient required a second operation. The presence of infection is the most important factor in wound breakdown and should be the focus for management protocols.

Keywords: High-risk pregnancy; Prevena™ negative pressure wound therapy; obesity in pregnancy; wound infection.

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques / instrumentation*
  • Adult
  • Cesarean Section* / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy / instrumentation*
  • Obesity, Morbid / complications
  • Pregnancy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Surgical Wound Dehiscence / etiology
  • Surgical Wound Dehiscence / prevention & control*
  • Surgical Wound Infection / etiology
  • Surgical Wound Infection / prevention & control*