Aims: To compare the infarct size calculated by the peak serum CK method with the anatomic infarct size in a population dying of acute myocardial infarction. CONCEPT AND PLACE OF THE STUDY: To use the method of peak serum CK in the assessment of infarct size, calculated by a method developed by the authors, in a population dying of acute myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit.
Methods: 193 patients who successively died with acute myocardial infarction entered the study. After establishing the exclusion criteria the anatomical infarct size was measured using the method developed by the authors of myocardial slices after fixation of the heart and by the peak CK method. The two methods were correlated using linear regression curves.
Results and conclusions: A global correlation between the two methods was found although wide scattered values were found. After dividing the population in several subgroups, the analysis showed that survival below 48 hours, death in left ventricular failure, inferior infarcts and reinfarction influenced negatively this correlation. The anatomical method showed its value for this kind of evaluation having always in mind its known limitations. The enzyme method looked less discriminating as peak CK, obtained by 12 h sampling will seldom reflect the peaks of CK liberation curve. As the study was applied to a population of patients dying of acute myocardial infarction its results cannot be applied without caution to a population of survivors. We anticipate that in such a population peak CK will have a better correlation with real CK peaks even with 12 hours sampling and therefore reflecting more accurately infarct size.