Physiotherapy Post Lumbar Discectomy: Prospective Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 12;10(11):e0142013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142013. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate: acceptability and feasibility of trial procedures; distribution of scores on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ, planned primary outcome); and efficient working of trial components.

Design and setting: A feasibility and external pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN33808269, assigned 10/12/2012) was conducted across 2 UK secondary care outpatient physiotherapy departments associated with regional spinal surgery centres.

Participants: Consecutive consenting patients aged >18 years; post primary, single level, lumbar discectomy.

Interventions: Participants were randomised to either 1:1 physiotherapy outpatient management including patient leaflet, or patient leaflet alone.

Main outcome measures: Blinded assessments were made at 4 weeks post surgery (baseline) and 12 weeks post baseline (proposed primary end point). Secondary outcomes included: Global Perceived Effect, back/leg pain, straight leg raise, return to work/function, quality of life, fear avoidance, range of movement, medication, re-operation.

Results: At discharge, 110 (44%) eligible patients gave consent to be contacted. 59 (54%) patients were recruited. Loss to follow up was 39% at 12 weeks, with one site contributing 83% losses. Mean (SD) RMDQ was 10.07 (5.58) leaflet and 10.52 (5.94) physiotherapy/leaflet at baseline; and 5.37 (4.91) leaflet and 5.53 (4.49) physiotherapy/leaflet at 12 weeks. 5.1% zero scores at 12 weeks illustrated no floor effect. Sensitivity to change was assessed at 12 weeks with mean (SD) change -4.53 (6.41), 95%CI -7.61 to -1.44 for leaflet; and -6.18 (5.59), 95%CI -9.01 to -3.30 for physiotherapy/leaflet. RMDQ mean difference (95%CI) between change from baseline to twelve weeks was 1.65(-2.46 to 5.75). Mean difference (95%CI) between groups at 12 weeks was -0.16 (-3.36 to 3.04). Participant adherence with treatment was good. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Both interventions were acceptable, and it is promising that they both demonstrated a trend in reducing disability in this population. A randomised controlled trial, using a different trial design, is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of combining the interventions into a stepped care intervention and comparing to a no intervention arm. Findings will guide design changes for an adequately powered randomised controlled trial, using RMDQ as the primary outcome.

Trial registration: ISRCTN registry 33808269.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Diskectomy / methods*
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Low Back Pain / physiopathology
  • Low Back Pain / surgery*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care / methods
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Outpatients / statistics & numerical data
  • Pain Measurement
  • Physical Therapy Modalities*
  • Pilot Projects
  • Postoperative Care / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Return to Work
  • Secondary Care / methods
  • Secondary Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors
  • United Kingdom

Associated data

  • ISRCTN/ISRCTN33808269

Grants and funding

This work was funded by: Queen Elizabeth Hospital Charity, http://www.qehb.org/, Grant number 17-3-780. Authors receiving funding: AH, AR, MC, LW, PCG. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.