Vascular Response to Experimental Stent Malapposition and Under-Expansion

Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 Jul;44(7):2251-60. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1518-x. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

Abstract

Up to 80% of all endovascular stents have malapposed struts, and while some impose catastrophic events others are inconsequential. Thirteen stents were implanted in coronary arteries of seven healthy Yorkshire pigs, using specially-designed cuffed balloons inducing controlled stent malapposition and under-expansion. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging confirmed that 25% of struts were malapposed (strut-wall distance <strut thickness) to variable extent (max. strut-wall distance malapposed group 0.51 ± 0.05 mm vs. apposed group 0.09 ± 0.05 mm, p = 2e-3). Imaging at follow-up revealed malapposition acutely resolved (<1% of struts remained malapposed at day 5), with strong correlation between lumen and the stent cross-sectional areas (slope = 0.86, p < 0.0001, R (2) = 0.94). OCT in three of the most significantly malapposed vessels at baseline showed high correlation of elastic lamina area and lumen area (R (2) = 0.96) suggesting all lumen loss was related to contraction of elastic lamina with negligible plaque/intimal hyperplasia growth. Simulation showed this vascular recoil could be partially explained by the non-uniform strain environment created from sub-optimal expansion of device and balloon, and the inability of stent support in the malapposed region to resist recoil. Malapposition as a result of stent under-expansion is resolved acutely in healthy normal arteries, suggesting existing animal models are limited in replicating clinically observed persistent stent malapposition.

Keywords: Malapposition; Optical coherence tomography; Pre-clinical model; Stent; Stent under-expansion.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Coronary Vessels* / diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Vessels* / physiopathology
  • Elasticity
  • Models, Cardiovascular*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / adverse effects*
  • Stents / adverse effects*
  • Swine
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence*