A survey of doctors at a UK teaching hospital to assess understanding of recent changes to consent law

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Apr 21:18:10-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.04.013. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The UK Supreme Court recently ruled that when consenting patients for treatments or procedures, clinicians must also discuss any associated material risks. We surveyed medical staff at a large UK teaching hospital in order to ascertain knowledge of consent law and current understanding of this change.

Materials and methods: Email survey sent to medical staff in all specialities at Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital in February 2016.

Results: 245 responses (141 Consultants and 104 junior doctors, response rate 32%). 82% consent patients for procedures at least monthly and 23% daily. 31% were not familiar with the concept of material risk. 35% were familiar with the recent change in consent law, 41% were not. 18% were "very uncertain" and 64% "a little uncertain" that their consenting process meets current legal requirements. >92% think that landmark cases and changes in law should be discussed through professional bodies and circulated better locally.

Conclusion: The majority were not familiar with the concept of material risk and recent legal changes. A majority were not confident that their practice meets current requirements, suggesting that recent changes in consent law may not be widely understood at this hospital. We suggest more guidance and education may be necessary than is currently available. Increased understanding of recent changes to consent law will reduce the risk taken by NHS trusts and offer patients a service compliant with Supreme Court guidance.

Keywords: Consent; Material risk; Montgomery.