Modeling the receptor pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of NKTR-214, a kinetically-controlled interleukin-2 (IL2) receptor agonist for cancer immunotherapy

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0179431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179431. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Cytokines are potent immune modulating agents but are not ideal medicines in their natural form due to their short half-life and pleiotropic systemic effects. NKTR-214 is a clinical-stage biologic that comprises interleukin-2 (IL2) protein bound by multiple releasable polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains. In this highly PEG-bound form, the IL2 is inactive; therefore, NKTR-214 is a biologic prodrug. When administered in vivo, the PEG chains slowly release, creating a cascade of increasingly active IL2 protein conjugates bound by fewer PEG chains. The 1-PEG-IL2 and 2-PEG-IL2 species derived from NKTR-214 are the most active conjugated-IL2 species. Free-IL2 protein is undetectable in vivo as it is eliminated faster than formed. The PEG chains on NKTR-214 are located at the region of IL2 that contacts the alpha (α) subunit of the heterotrimeric IL2 receptor complex, IL2Rαβγ, reducing its ability to bind and activate the heterotrimer. The IL2Rαβγ complex is constitutively expressed on regulatory T cells (Tregs). Therefore, without the use of mutations, PEGylation reduces the affinity for IL2Rαβγ to a greater extent than for IL2Rβγ, the receptor complex predominant on CD8 T cells. NKTR-214 treatment in vivo favors activation of CD8 T cells over Tregs in the tumor microenvironment to provide anti-tumor efficacy in multiple syngeneic models. Mechanistic modeling based on in vitro and in vivo kinetic data provides insight into the mechanism of NKTR-214 pharmacology. The model reveals that conjugated-IL2 protein derived from NKTR-214 occupy IL-2Rβγ to a greater extent compared to free-IL2 protein. The model accurately describes the sustained in vivo signaling observed after a single dose of NKTR-214 and explains how the properties of NKTR-214 impart a unique kinetically-controlled immunological mechanism of action.

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes / drug effects
  • CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes / immunology
  • CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes / metabolism
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Drug Liberation
  • Female
  • Immunotherapy / methods*
  • Interleukin Receptor Common gamma Subunit / agonists
  • Interleukin Receptor Common gamma Subunit / metabolism
  • Interleukin-2 / analogs & derivatives*
  • Interleukin-2 / pharmacokinetics
  • Interleukin-2 / pharmacology
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit / agonists
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit / metabolism
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor beta Subunit / agonists
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor beta Subunit / metabolism
  • Kinetics
  • Mice, Inbred BALB C
  • Mice, Inbred C3H
  • Mice, Inbred C57BL
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Neoplasms / immunology
  • Neoplasms / metabolism
  • Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Phosphorylation / drug effects
  • Polyethylene Glycols / pharmacokinetics
  • Polyethylene Glycols / pharmacology*
  • Prodrugs / pharmacokinetics
  • Prodrugs / pharmacology
  • Receptors, Interleukin-2 / agonists*
  • Receptors, Interleukin-2 / metabolism
  • STAT5 Transcription Factor / metabolism
  • T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory / drug effects
  • T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory / immunology
  • T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory / metabolism
  • Transplantation, Homologous
  • Tumor Microenvironment / drug effects
  • Tumor Microenvironment / immunology

Substances

  • Il2rg protein, mouse
  • Interleukin Receptor Common gamma Subunit
  • Interleukin-2
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit
  • Interleukin-2 Receptor beta Subunit
  • Prodrugs
  • Receptors, Interleukin-2
  • STAT5 Transcription Factor
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • bempegaldesleukin

Grants and funding

The study was funded by Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California, United States of America. All authors are salaried employees of Nektar Therapeutics. DC, SK and JZ were involved in the study design, data collection and analysis. DC and JZ were involved in the decision to publish. DC, SK and UH were involved with the writing and preparation of the manuscript. Nektar Therapeutics provided support in the form of salaries for all authors, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.