The association of between assisted reproduction technology and malpresentation/induction of labor: a meta-analysis

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Oct;31(20):2782-2787. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1355905. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Abstract

Background: Some epidemiological studies have investigated that assisted reproduction technology (ART) can increase the risk of malpresentation and induction of labor. To date, no meta-analysis has been performed for assessing the relationship between ART and malpresention/induction of labor. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between ART and malpresention/induction of labor.

Methods: A systematic search was carried out in major databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to May 2017. The heterogeneity across studies was explored by Q-test and I2 statistic. The publication bias was assessed by Begg's and Egger's tests. The results were showed using odds ratio (OR) estimate with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model.

Results: The systematic search included 2103 articles until May 2017 with 1,401,448 participants. Based on OR estimates obtained from case-control and cohort studies, there was significant association between ART and risk of the induction of labor/malpresentation (1.33; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.43) and (1.58; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.98), respectively.

Conclusions: We showed based on reports in epidemiological studies that ART is a risk factor for malpresentation and induction of labor.

Keywords: Assisted reproduction technology; breech; malpresentation; meta-analysis; pregnancy.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Labor Presentation*
  • Labor, Induced*
  • Pregnancy
  • Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / adverse effects*