Objectives: To assess the performance of the "Computer-Aided Nodule Assessment and Risk Yield" (CANARY) software in the differentiation and risk assessment of histological subtypes of lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as pure ground glass nodules on computed tomography (CT).
Methods: 64 surgically resected and histologically proven adenocarcinomas manifesting as pure ground-glass nodules on CT were assessed using CANARY software, which classifies voxel-densities into three risk components (low, intermediate, and high risk). Differences in risk components between histological adenocarcinoma subtypes were analysed. To determine the optimal threshold reflecting the presence of an invasive focus, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were calculated.
Results: 28/64 (44%) were adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS); 26/64 (41%) were minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA); and 10/64 (16%) were invasive ACs (IAC). The software showed significant differences in risk components between histological subtypes (P<0.001-0.003). A relative volume of 45% or less of low-risk components was associated with histological invasiveness (specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%).
Conclusions: CANARY-based risk assessment of ACs manifesting as pure ground glass nodules on CT allows the differentiation of their histological subtypes. A threshold of 45% of low-risk components reflects invasiveness in these groups.
Key points: • CANARY-based risk assessment allows the differentiation of their histological subtypes. • 45% or less of low-risk component reflects histological invasiveness. • CANARY has potential role in suspected adenocarcinomas manifesting as pure ground-glass nodules.
Keywords: Computed tomography; Lung adenocarcinoma; Pure ground glass nodule; Risk stratification; Software based.