HER2-positive breast cancer is lost in translation: time for patient-centered research

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov;14(11):669-681. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.96. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

Abstract

No biomarker beyond HER2 itself, which suffers from a low positive predictive value, has demonstrated clinical utility in breast cancer, despite numerous attempts to improve treatment tailoring for the growing number of anti-HER2 targeted therapies. This prompted us to examine the body of evidence, using a systematic approach, to identify putative predictive biomarkers in HER2-positive breast cancer, and discuss the hitherto failure to address the needs of patients. In the future, it is hoped immune-based biomarkers will predict benefit from anti-HER2 treatments in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In advanced-stage disease, the quantification of tumour heterogeneity using molecular-imaging technology has generated informative data on the success or failure of the antibody-drug conjugate T-DM1. Treatment tailoring remains a high priority, in cost-constrained health-care systems, but such tailoring will require a dramatic shift in the way translational research is being conducted, with the establishment of large, easily accessible, and well-annotated databases of candidate predictive biomarkers. Single-centre biomarker research should become a thing of the past.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers, Tumor / genetics*
  • Breast Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Breast Neoplasms / genetics
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Precision Medicine / methods*
  • Receptor, ErbB-2 / genetics*
  • Signal Transduction
  • Translational Research, Biomedical
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • ERBB2 protein, human
  • Receptor, ErbB-2