Post-operative bracing after pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures: A cost-effectiveness study

J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Nov:45:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.07.038. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Abstract

Purpose: While frequently prescribed to patients following fixation for spine trauma, the utility of spinal orthoses during the post-operative period is poorly described in the literature. In this study, we calculated rates of reoperation and performed a decision analysis to determine the utility of bracing following pedicle screw fixation for thoracic and lumbar burst fractures.

Methods: Pubmed was searched for articles published between 2005 and 2015 for terms related to pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures. Additionally, a database of neurosurgical patients operated on within the authors institution was also used in the analysis. Incidences of significant adverse events (wound revision for either dehiscence or infection or re-operation for non-union or instability due to hardware failure) were determined. Pooled means and variances of reported parameters were obtained using a random-effects, inverse variance meta-analytic model for observational data. Utilities for surgical outcome and complications were assigned using previously published values.

Results: Of the 225 abstracts reviewed, 48 articles were included in the study, yielding a total of 1957 patients. After including patients from the institutional registry, together a total of 2081 patients were included in the final analysis, 1328 of whom were braced. Non-braced patients were older then braced patients, although this only approached significance (p=0.051). Braced patients had significantly lower rates of re-operation for non-union or clinically significant hardware failure (1.3% vs. 1.8%, p<0.001) although the groups had comparable rates of operative wound dehiscence and infection (p=1.000). These two approaches yielded comparable utility scores (p=0.120). Costs between braced and non-braced patients were comparable excluding the cost of the brace (p=0.256); hence, the added cost of the brace suggests that bracing post-operatively is not a cost effective measure.

Conclusions: Bracing following operative stabilization of thoracolumbar fracture does not significantly improve stability, nor does it increase wound complications. Moreover, our data suggests that post-operative bracing may not be a cost-effective measure.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Pedicle screw fixation; Thoracolumbar bracing; Thoracolumbar burst fracture.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Female
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / adverse effects*
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / economics
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods
  • Humans
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pedicle Screws / adverse effects*
  • Pedicle Screws / economics
  • Postoperative Complications / economics*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Reoperation
  • Spinal Fractures / economics
  • Spinal Fractures / surgery*
  • Thoracic Vertebrae / surgery