Decreased prevalence of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis: A case-control study

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188120. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Background: Studies of cancer prevalence have produced conflicting results concerning the relative risk of overall and specific sub-types of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Contemporary controls and information on tobacco use and alcohol consumption are generally missing from previous studies.

Objectives: To evaluate lifetime cancer prevalence in a large cohort of MS patients relative to appropriate controls.

Methods: We conducted a case-control study, using a postal survey of a cohort of MS patients. Of the 1574 questionnaires sent, 1107 could be used for statistical analysis. Data from 1568 controls were prospectively collected using the same self-administered survey among consecutive out-patients in a single neurology department. Propensity scores matched on age, gender, and history of smoking and alcohol consumption were calculated.

Results: Among the MS patients, 7.32% had ever presented with a cancer, whereas 12,63% of the controls had, leading to a bootstrap matched odds ratio (OR) of 0.63; 95% CI 0.57-0.70. Although only exploratory, the use of DMT (immunomodulators or immunosupressants) did not appear to increase this risk (p = 0.42). The disease course also did not affect cancer prevalence.

Conclusion: MS was associated with a reduced overall cancer risk.

MeSH terms

  • Case-Control Studies
  • Computer Simulation
  • Demography
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Sclerosis / complications*
  • Multiple Sclerosis / epidemiology*
  • Multiple Sclerosis / therapy
  • Neoplasms / complications*
  • Neoplasms / epidemiology*
  • Neoplasms / therapy
  • Odds Ratio
  • Prevalence
  • Propensity Score
  • Risk Factors

Grants and funding

We received funding from “TEVA pharma”. These funding was used to print questionnaires, and to buy stamps and envelopes to send them. The funders (TEVA-pharma), they had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.