Background: Resection of posterior mediastinal tumors may be complicated by bleeding or neurologic injury. Preoperative spinal angiography of mediastinal tumors has been underreported or not commonly practiced. This study evaluated the selection criteria and outcomes of patients with posterior mediastinal tumors who underwent preoperative angiography and embolization.
Methods: This was a single-institution retrospective study of patients with posterior mediastinal tumors from 2002 to 2016. Multilevel spinal angiography was performed, with or without selective arterial embolization of vascular supply, in patients selected by thoracic or neurologic surgeons.
Results: Ten of 87 patients (11%) with posterior mediastinal tumors underwent preoperative angiography. A mean of 11 arteries (range, 2 to 25) were studied. Embolization in 7 of 10 patients successfully occluded 1 to 3 arteries. There was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, operative time, operative blood loss, complications, or death between patients with or without angiography. Patients who underwent angiography had larger tumors (1,490 vs 97 cm3, p < 0.0001), involvement of the neuroforamen (44% vs 10%, p < 0.05), and a longer hospital stay (9 vs 4.5 days, p < 0.05). Angiography was complicated in 1 patient by vocal cord ulceration after intubation of a tumor-compressed trachea. Shared blood supply between the tumor and the spinal cord precluded embolization and tumor resection in 1 patient. Use of angiography increased over time.
Conclusions: Selective preoperative angiography for evaluation of posterior mediastinal tumors identifies arterial variations, threatened spinal arteries, and targets for embolization. The specific role of angiography and embolization requires further investigation to standardize indications and protocols for the number of arteries examined.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.