Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU)

BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 6;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1676-0.

Abstract

Background: It is recommended that critically ill patients undergo routine delirium monitoring with a valid and reliable tool such as the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). However, the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the CAM-ICU has not been investigated. Here, we test the validity and reliability of the Arabic CAM-ICU.

Methods: We conducted a psychometric study at ICUs in a tertiary-care hospital in Saudi Arabia. We recruited consecutive adult Arabic-speaking patients, who had stayed in the ICU for at least 24 hours, and had a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score ≥ - 2 at examination. Two well-trained examiners (ICU nurse and intensivist) independently assessed delirium in eligible patients with the Arabic CAM-ICU. Evaluations by the two examiners were compared with psychiatrist blind clinical assessment of delirium according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Subgroup analyses were conducted for age, invasive mechanical ventilation, and gender.

Results: We included 108 patients (mean age: 62.6 ± 17.6; male: 51.9%), of whom 37% were on invasive mechanical ventilation. Delirium was diagnosed in 63% of enrolled patients as per the psychiatrist clinical assessment. The Arabic CAM-ICU sensitivity was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63-0.84) and 56% (95%CI = 0.44-0.68) for the ICU nurse and intensivist, respectively. Specificity was 98% (95%CI = 0.93-1.0) and 92% (95%CI = 0.84-1.0), respectively. Sensitivity was greater for mechanically-ventilated patients, women, and those aged ≥65 years. Specificity was greater for those aged < 65 years, non-mechanically-ventilated patients and men. The median duration to complete the Arabic CAM-ICU was 2 min (interquartile range, 2-3) and 4.5 min (IQR, 3-5) for the ICU nurse and intensivist, respectively. Inter-rater reliability (kappa) was 0.66.

Conclusions: The Arabic CAM-ICU demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity to assess delirium in Arabic-speaking ICU patients.

Keywords: Arabic; CAM-ICU; Cognition; Critical care; Delirium; Geriatric; Inattention; Mechanical ventilation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Critical Illness / epidemiology
  • Critical Illness / psychology*
  • Delirium / diagnosis*
  • Delirium / epidemiology
  • Delirium / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units / standards*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Respiration, Artificial / psychology
  • Respiration, Artificial / standards
  • Saudi Arabia / epidemiology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*