Background: Several ways of performing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (RHC) have evolved. The vascular pedicle can be divided into extracorporeal (RHC-EC) or intracorporeal (RHC-IC). It is not known whether vessel ligation during RHC-EC is as central as during RHC-IC. We compare these approaches in terms of pathological and short-term clinical outcomes.
Methods: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic RHC in a single centre (July 2013-September 2016) were identified. Data collection included operative details, length of stay, complications, specimen parameters including number and involvement of lymph nodes and recurrence.
Results: One hundred and sixty-nine patients were included (94 RHC-IC, 75 RHC-EC). For caecal and ascending colon cancers, mesocolic width was greater after RHC-IC than RHC-EC (7.9 cm versus 6.6 cm, P < 0.05), as was lymph node yield (19.5 versus 17.3, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in length of colon resected, distal resection margin, number of positive nodes, proportion of node-positive tumours and R1 rate. Operative duration was higher for RHC-IC (163 min versus 91 min, P < 0.001), as was incidence of ileus (35% versus 15%, P < 0.05). Length of stay also tended to be higher (7.4 days versus 6.0 days, P = 0.19). There was no difference in disease recurrence (follow-up 12 months). Body mass index was positively correlated with lymph node yield for RHC-EC, but not for RHC-IC.
Conclusion: Lymph node yield after laparoscopic RHC is adequate, whether the vascular pedicle is taken intracorporeal or extracorporeal, supporting the use of both approaches. RHC-IC yields more lymph nodes and greater mesocolic width, but involves a longer operation and higher incidence of ileus.
Keywords: colon cancer; laparoscopic surgery; lymph node yield.
© 2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.