Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and degree of acceptance by children and adolescents of the use of oscillating tips compared with rotating drills.
Design: Systematic review.
Data sources: PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Library and Web of Science (October 2017).
Eligibility criteria: Controlled randomised or non-randomised trials that evaluated sonic and ultrasonic oscillating devices versus rotating drill.
Data extraction: Eligible studies were selected and data extracted independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Method.
Results: Two controlled clinical trials comprising 123 children aged 2-12 years old were identified. Both trials were at high risk of selection bias and unclear risk of detection bias. In one trial, pain due to the use of oscillating drill resulted lower than employing rotating drill (Verbal Hochman Scale: RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.00); Visual Facial Expression Scale: RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.94)). In another study, compared with traditional drill ultrasonic tip was associated with a lower level of patient's discomfort (RR 0.40 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.79)) but not with dental anxiety (RR 1.29 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.71)). The effectiveness of the removal of caries as well as fillings durability were only considered in one study, but no statistically significant differences were found between the two interventions.
Conclusions: The evidence based on two low-quality studies was insufficient to conclude that the use of oscillating tips for the management of pain and dental fear in children or adolescents compared with rotating drills was more effective.
Keywords: children and adolescents; dental fear/dental anxiety; pain management; rotating instruments; sonic or ultrasonic device; systematic review.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.