Effect of genetic background and delivery route on the preclinical properties of a live attenuated RSV vaccine

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 19;13(6):e0199452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199452. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

A safe and effective vaccine against RSV remains an important unmet public health need. Intranasally (IN) delivered live-attenuated vaccines represent the most extensively studied approach for immunization of RSV-naïve infants and children, however, achieving an effective balance of attenuation and immunogenicity has proven challenging. Here we report pre-clinical immunogenicity and efficacy data utilizing a live-attenuated vaccine candidate, RGΔM2-2, which was obtained by deleting the M2-2 open reading frame from the genome of the MSA1 clinical isolate. Intramuscular (IM) administration of RGΔM2-2 in cotton rats induced immunity and protective efficacy that was comparable to that induced by intranasal (IN) immunization. In contrast, the protective efficacy of RGΔM2-2 delivered by the IM route to African green monkeys was substantially reduced as compared to the efficacy following IN administration, despite comparable levels of serum neutralizing antibodies. This result suggests that mucosal immunity may play an important role in RSV protection. The RGΔM2-2 vaccine also demonstrated different attenuation profiles when tested in cotton rats, non-human primates, and a human airway epithelial (HAE) cell model. The data suggest RGΔM2-2 is less attenuated than a similarly designed vaccine candidate constructed on the A2 genetic background. These findings have important implications with regard to both the design and the preclinical safety testing of live-attenuated vaccines.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Intranasal
  • Animals
  • Chlorocebus aethiops / immunology
  • Epithelial Cells / drug effects
  • Epithelial Cells / immunology
  • Genome, Viral / genetics
  • Humans
  • Immunization*
  • Injections, Intramuscular
  • Open Reading Frames
  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections / immunology
  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections / prevention & control*
  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections / virology
  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines / administration & dosage*
  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines / genetics
  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines / immunology
  • Respiratory Syncytial Viruses / immunology
  • Respiratory Syncytial Viruses / pathogenicity
  • Sigmodontinae / immunology
  • Vaccines, Attenuated / administration & dosage*
  • Vaccines, Attenuated / genetics
  • Vaccines, Attenuated / immunology

Substances

  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines
  • Vaccines, Attenuated

Grants and funding

The funder, Sanofi Pasteur, provided support in the form of salaries for authors RG, JD, KJ, MK, NJ, HK, SD, LZ, and MP and research materials but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. However, the funder had to approve submission of the manuscript and what data was acceptable for public dissemination. KJ is currently affiliated with LG Chemistry which is providing support in the form of salary. LG Chemistry Ltd. did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.