Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of rhBMP2 with rhBMP9 on ridge augmentation following healing of extraction sockets in dogs.
Material and methods: Five male Beagle dogs, approximately 12 months of age, were used. The mesial roots of the four maxillary premolars were endodontically treated. The distal roots were extracted, and the buccal bony walls removed. All extraction sockets were filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). A collagen membrane was soaked with 4 μg or 20 μg of rhBMP9, 20 μg of rhBMP2 or sterile saline and placed over the augmented sites. All animals were euthanized after 8 weeks of healing and investigated by micro-CT and histologic analysis. A one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc test was used to compare the differences between the four groups.
Results: New bone apposition in all defects was observed from the original bone. RhBMP samples showed an increase in bone formation in the buccal area and better integration of DBBM particles when compared to control sites. Both rhBMP9 defects showed higher values of bone (p = 0.024), bone marrow (p = 0.044), and total augmentation volume (p = 0.033) than the rhBMP2 (20 μg) or control sites. Highest bone area was found in rhBMP9 defects (p = 0.895).
Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, rhBMP9 sites demonstrated higher bone-inducing potential in combination with DBBM than rhBMP2. While rhBMP9s failed to demonstrate a clear dose-response relationship to the outcomes, future studies are necessary to evaluate the appropriate dose and carrier systems.
Keywords: RhBMP; extraction socket; guided bone regeneration; regeneration.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.