Estimating causal effects of treatment in RCTs with provider and subject noncompliance

Stat Med. 2019 Feb 28;38(5):738-750. doi: 10.1002/sim.8012. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

Abstract

Subject noncompliance is a common problem in the analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). With cognitive behavioral interventions, the addition of provider noncompliance further complicates making causal inference. As a motivating example, we consider an RCT of a motivational interviewing (MI)-based behavioral intervention for treating problem drug use. Treatment receipt depends on compliance of both a therapist (provider) and a patient (subject), where MI is received when the therapist adheres to the MI protocol and the patient actively participates in the intervention. However, therapists cannot be forced to follow protocol and patients cannot be forced to cooperate in an intervention. In this article, we (1) define a causal estimand of interest based on a principal stratification framework, the average causal effect of treatment among provider-subject pairs that comply with assignment or ACE(cc); (2) explore possible assumptions that identify ACE(cc); (3) develop novel estimators of ACE(cc); (4) evaluate estimators' statistical properties via simulation; and (5) apply our proposed methods for estimating ACE(cc) to data from our motivating example.

Keywords: behavioral intervention; causal inference; principal stratification; two-level noncompliance.

MeSH terms

  • Causality
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Guideline Adherence / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Motivational Interviewing*
  • Patient Compliance / statistics & numerical data*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
  • Substance-Related Disorders / therapy