Outcomes and swallowing evaluations after injection laryngoplasty for type I laryngeal cleft: Does age matter?

Abstract

Objectives: To improve the recognition of differences in presentation amongst patients with type 1 laryngeal clefts of various ages and better understand the age dependent outcomes of injection laryngoplasty. A second aim was to analyze the discrepancies between swallow assessment modalities in various age groups with type I laryngeal clefts undergoing injection laryngoplasty.

Methods: A retrospective review of electronic medical records of patients who underwent injection laryngoplasty from 2009 through 2015 at a tertiary care children's hospital. Data extracted included: Demographics, histories and physical exam findings, diagnostic studies, and medical and surgical treatments.

Results: Most (72/102, 70.6%) patients were male with a median gestational age at birth of 37 weeks (range 24-41 weeks). Formula thickening and GERD medications were used in 94/102 (92.2%) and 97/102 (95.1%) patients, respectively. Comorbid GERD, laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, and subglottic stenosis were present in 98/102 (96.1%), 40/102 (39.2%), 9/102 (8.8%), and 14/102 (13.7%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in demographics, comorbidities or medical therapy between age groups. Symptoms at presentation differed between age groups with stridor (χ²(1) = 11.6, p = 0.002) and cyanosis (χ²(1) = 8.13, p = 0.012) being more common in the 0-3-month group compared to the 12-36 month group. Symptom resolution and the odds of undergoing additional surgery (second injection or suture repair) over time, however, did not differ. There was a significant reduction in aspiration with thins during FEES (McNemar χ²(1) = 10.7, p = 0.002) and aspiration with nectar during MBS (McNemar χ²(1) = 5.26, p = 0.035) post-injection. After injection, there was significant agreement in aspiration with thins between FEES and MBS (kappa = 0.308 ± SE 0.170, p = 0.035). However, finding aspiration with thins was more common during MBS than during FEES (McNemar χ²(1) = 7.00, p = 0.016). There were no differences in swallow evaluation findings between the age groups.

Conclusions: Symptoms of type I laryngeal clefts may differ by age. However, there was no impact of age on the safety and efficacy of surgical intervention.

Keywords: Aspiration; Dysphagia; Injection laryngoplasty; Laryngeal cleft; Prolaryn gel.