Efficacy, Acceptability, and Safety of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Administration for Mild-To-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(4):1379-1387. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180888.

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy/safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients was performed. Six randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (n = 801) were included in this study. No significant difference in cognitive function was observed between the groups. Moreover, IVIG was inferior to placebo in behavioral disturbances (mean difference = 2.19). Further, IVIG administration was associated with a higher incidence of rash than placebo. Our results do not support IVIG administration for mild-to-moderate AD, suggesting that IVIG is not effective to treat mild-to-moderate AD and that it deteriorates behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in mild-to-moderate AD.

Keywords: Efficacy; intravenous immunoglobulin; meta-analysis; mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease; safety; systematic review.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Alzheimer Disease / drug therapy*
  • Cognition / drug effects*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulins, Intravenous / administration & dosage
  • Immunoglobulins, Intravenous / adverse effects
  • Immunoglobulins, Intravenous / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Immunoglobulins, Intravenous