Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has the characteristics of high incidence, mortality, disability rate, and heavy economic burden. Symptomatic measures such as anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic and anti-asthmatic are widely used in the treatment of COPD, and pulmonary rehabilitation has not been fully utilized. It is reported that up to 10 different kinds of Traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) are often used for treating stable COPD. There are many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews that have evaluated the efficacy of various TCEs for COPD. However, most of these studies were designed in comparison with conventional western medicine or health education. There are rarely studies to compare different TCEs head to head. Therefore, there remains uncertainty regarding the comparative efficacy among different TCEs. Thus, we plan to conduct a systematic review and Network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy among 5 different TCEs and rank their benefits relative to each other. It is hoped that the findings of this study will facilitate the management and application of TCEs in the treatment of COPD.
Methods: A systematic and comprehensive literature search will be performed from inception to April 2019 in both English and Chinese databases, involving Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, and Chongqing VIP information. RCTs related to TCE in the treatment of COPD will be included. Quality of included trials will be assessed according to the risk of bias tool of Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. The GRADE approach will be used to rate the certainty of the evidence of estimates derived from NMA. Data analysis will be conducted by using STATA 14.0.
Results: This systematic review and NMA aims to summarize the direct and indirect evidence for different kinds of TCEs and to rank these TCEs. The findings of this NMA will be reported according to the PRISMA-NMA statement. The results of the NMA will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal once completed.
Conclusion: Using NMA, this study will provide an evidence profile which will be helpful to inform the selection of TCE for treating patients with COPD. The results will inform clinicians, bridge the evidence gaps, and identify promising TCE for future trials.
Prospero registration number: PROSPERO CRD 42019132970.