Thrombogenicity and Antithrombotic Strategies in Structural Heart Interventions and Nonaortic Cardiac Device Therapy-Current Evidence and Practice

Thromb Haemost. 2019 Oct;119(10):1590-1605. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694751. Epub 2019 Aug 17.

Abstract

As the number of, and the indications for, structural heart interventions are increasing worldwide, the optimal secondary prevention to reduce device thrombosis is becoming more important. To date, most of the recommendations are empiric. The current review discusses mechanisms behind device-related thrombosis, the available evidence with regard to antithrombotic regimen after cardiac device implantation, as well as providing an algorithm for identification of risk factors for device thrombogenicity and for management of device thrombosis after implantation of patent foramen ovale and left atrial appendage occluders, MitraClips/transcatheter mitral valve replacement, pacemaker leads, and left ventricular assist devices. Of note, the topic of antithrombotic therapy and thrombogenicity of prostheses in aortic position (transcatheter aortic valve replacement, surgical, mechanical, and bioprostheses) is not part of the present article and is discussed in detail in other contemporary focused articles.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Bioprosthesis
  • Cardiac Catheterization / instrumentation
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures
  • Cardiology / trends*
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Foramen Ovale, Patent / complications
  • Heart Failure / physiopathology
  • Heart Failure / therapy*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Heart-Assist Devices / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Mitral Valve / surgery
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Thrombosis / etiology
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Fibrinolytic Agents