Responses of weed community, soil nutrients, and microbes to different weed management practices in a fallow field in Northern China

PeerJ. 2019 Sep 6:7:e7650. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7650. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The long-term use of herbicides to remove weeds in fallow croplands can impair soil biodiversity, affect the quality of agricultural products, and threaten human health. Consequently, the identification of methods that can effectively limit the weed seed bank and maintain fallow soil fertility without causing soil pollution for the next planting is a critical task. In this study, four weeding treatments were established based on different degrees of disturbance to the topsoil: natural fallow (N), physical clearance (C), deep tillage (D), and sprayed herbicide (H). The changes in the soil weed seed banks, soil nutrients, and soil microbial biomass were carefully investigated. During the fallow period, the C treatment decreased the annual and biennial weed seed bank by 34% against pretreatment, whereas the H treatment did not effectively reduce the weed seed bank. The D treatment had positive effects on the soil fertility, increasing the available nitrogen 108% over that found in the N soil. In addition, a pre-winter deep tillage interfered with the rhizome propagation of perennial weeds. The total biomass of soil bacterial, fungal, and actinomycete in H treatment was the lowest among the four treatments. The biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the N treatment was respectively 42%, 35%, and 91%, higher than that in the C, D, and H treatments. An ecological weeding strategy was proposed based on our findings, which called for exhausting seed banks, blocking seed transmission, and taking advantage of natural opportunities to prevent weed growth for fallow lands. This study could provide a theoretical basis for weed management in fallow fields and organic farming systems.

Keywords: Fallow field; Glyphosate; Organic farming; Soil microorganisms; Weed seed bank.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2016YFC0500708), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31670413), and the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2017YFC1700701). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.