Systematic review and meta-analysis of docetaxel perioperative chemotherapy regimens in gastric and esophagogastric tumors

Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 1;9(1):15806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52334-y.

Abstract

FLOT regimen became the standard perioperative treatment in several centers around the world for esophagogastric tumors despite concerns about toxicity. In addition, FLOT has never been compared with other docetaxel-based regimens. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science including prospective or retrospective studies of docetaxel based perioperative regimen in gastric and esophagogastric tumors. Data regarding chemotherapy regimens, efficacy and toxicity were extracted. Outcomes were compared using a random effects model. Of 548 abstracts, 16 were considered eligible. Comparing the studies with meta-analysis we can see that the regimens are similar in terms of pathological complete response, resection rate, progression free survival and overall survival in one year, without significant heterogeneity. The meta-regression of docetaxel dose failed to show any association with dose ranging between 120-450 mg/m². Regarding the toxicity of the regimens it is noted that the regimens are quite toxic (up to 50-70% of grade 3-4 neutropenia). The results of this meta-analysis with a combined sample size of more than 1,000 patients suggest that docetaxel perioperative regimens are equivalent in outcomes. Prospective trials addressing modified regimens should be performed to provide less toxic strategies and be applicable to all patients.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / therapeutic use*
  • Docetaxel / therapeutic use*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Perioperative Care
  • Stomach Neoplasms / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
  • Docetaxel