Introduction: Clinical trials have failed to reliably show improved outcomes with utilization of contact-force sensing (CFS) radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheters. It is unknown whether the unfavorable outcomes observed in these trials are attributable to inexperience with CFS technology.
Objectives: To compare catheter ablation outcomes of stepwise linear ablation with versus without CFS technology and to assess the impact of operator experience with CFS technology on procedural outcomes.
Methods: Clinical outcomes were evaluated in 228 consecutive NPAF patients undergoing first-time left atrial ablation using a stepwise linear approach. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 2-week event monitors at 3-month intervals following index ablation.
Results: A total of 228 patients were included in our study. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias at 12 and 24 months between CFS and non-CFS patients (p = 0.5 and p = 0.169). The time to recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 24 months in the second half of CFS patients was significantly lower when compared to both the first half of CFS patients (p = 0.002) and non-CFS patients (p = 0.005).
Conclusion: While there was no difference in overall outcomes between CFS and non-CFS ablation using a stepwise linear approach in patients with NPAF, procedural efficacy of the second half of CFS patients was significantly improved compared to both the first half of CFS patients and all non-CFS patients. Lack of benefit seen in clinical trials using CFS technology may be related to operator inexperience with CFS ablation catheters at the time of the trials.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Contact-force sensing; Procedural outcomes; Radiofrequency ablation; Stepwise.