Leisure-time physical activity and sports in the Brazilian population: A social disparity analysis

PLoS One. 2019 Dec 3;14(12):e0225940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225940. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) or sports in the Brazilian population according to demographic and income variables.

Methods: Data from 60,202 Brazilian individuals (18 years and over) were analyzed, belonging to the National Health Survey 2013 sample. The prevalence of different modalities of LTPA and sports was estimated according to age, sex, skin color and income. The adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated by Poisson regression.

Results: Of every thousand Brazilians, 695 do not practice LTPA or sports. Walking is the most practiced LTPA (98/1000), followed by soccer (68/1000) and weight training (45/1000). For poor and black men, the most frequent LTPA was soccer, and, for women, gymnastics and walking. The prevalence of weight training and gymnastics was higher for white people compared with black people. All LTPA practices were more prevalent in individuals with higher income, except for soccer. Running on a treadmill and weight training had, respectively, 24.7 and 6.4 times higher prevalence in the richer quartile.

Conclusions: The study allowed identifying the type of LTPA and sport reported as the most frequent by the Brazilian population according to age, sex, skin color, and income, detecting strong social disparities in these practices.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Brazil / epidemiology
  • Ethnicity
  • Exercise*
  • Female
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Leisure Activities*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prevalence
  • Sex Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Sports*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

Brazilian Ministry of Health (no. 817122/2015) funded the project; National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) funded the scholarship of productivity of D.C. Malta and M. B. A. Barros. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.