The association between prostate weight and positive surgical margins in prostate cancer: A meta-analysis

Andrologia. 2020 Apr;52(3):e13533. doi: 10.1111/and.13533. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

Abstract

There have been some conflicting claims whether larger prostate weight (PW) reduces the risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs). This study aims to examine the associations between PW and PSMs. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane library were systematically retrieved. Relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesised utilising random-effect models. Ultimately, 22 cohort studies met criteria were enrolled in this meta-analysis, of which 18 studies reporting the RR of the highest VS lowest category of PW yielded the combined RR of PSMs of 0.61 (95% CI 0.50-0.74). Subgroup analysis showed that geographic region and surgical modalities were considered as potential confounders of influence of PW on PSMs. The nonlinear dose-response relationship demonstrated that PSM risk decreased by 1% (RR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) for every one gram increment in PW. This study suggests PW has a negative association with risk of PSMs, and having a appropriate PW is very important.

Keywords: dose-response; meta-analysis; prostate weight; prostatectomy; surgical margins.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Male
  • Margins of Excision*
  • Organ Size
  • Prostate / pathology*
  • Prostate / surgery
  • Prostatectomy*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / surgery*