Implementation of the FilmArray ME panel in laboratory routine using a simple sample selection strategy for diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis

BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 22;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4904-4.

Abstract

Background: Infectious meningitis is a serious disease and patient outcome relies on fast and reliable diagnostics. A syndromic panel testing approach like the FilmArray ME can accelerate diagnosis and therefore decrease the time to pathogen specific therapy. Yet, its clinical utility is controversial, mainly because of a remaining uncertainty in correct interpretation of results, limited data on its performance on clinical specimens and its relatively high costs. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical performance of the assay in a real life setting at a tertiary university hospital using a pragmatic and simple sample selection strategy to reduce the overall cost burden.

Methods: Over a period of 18 months we received 4623 CSF samples (2338 hospitalizations, 1601 individuals). FilmArray ME analysis was restricted to CSF-samples with a high pretest probability of infectious meningitis, e.g. positive Gram-stain, samples in which leukocytes and/or bacteria were evident or urgent suspicion of infection was communicated by clinicians. N = 171 samples matched to our risk criteria and were subjected to FilmArray ME analysis. Those samples were also analyzed by reference methods: culture only (n = 45), PCR only (n = 20) or both methods (n = 106).

Results: 56/171 (32.75%) were FilmArray ME positive. Bacterial pathogens were detected in 30/56 (53.57%), viral pathogens were detected in 27/56 (48.21%) and yeast DNA was detected in 1/56 (1.79%) of positive samples. Double detection occurred in 2/56 samples. In 52/56 (92.86%) FilmArray ME positive samples, results could be confirmed by the reference assays (sensitivity = 96.30%, specificity =96.58%).

Conclusion: The FilmArray ME assay is a fast and reliable diagnostic tool for the management of infectious meningitis and can easily be implemented in routine diagnostic workflows. However, correlation of test results and underlying clinical symptoms requires experienced users and the awareness of potentially false negative or false positive results. Moreover, considering the need for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the use of molecular tests as a stand-alone diagnostic cannot be recommended.

Keywords: Film Array ME; Infectious meningitis; Rapid diagnostic; Syndromic panel testing.

MeSH terms

  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / economics
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / methods*
  • Encephalitis / cerebrospinal fluid
  • Encephalitis / diagnosis*
  • Encephalitis / microbiology
  • Encephalitis / virology
  • Gentian Violet
  • Germany
  • Hospitals, University
  • Humans
  • Laboratories
  • Meningitis / cerebrospinal fluid
  • Meningitis / diagnosis*
  • Meningitis / microbiology
  • Meningitis / virology
  • Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / economics
  • Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / methods*
  • Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction / economics
  • Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods*
  • Phenazines
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Staining and Labeling / economics
  • Staining and Labeling / methods*
  • Tertiary Care Centers

Substances

  • Gram's stain
  • Phenazines
  • Gentian Violet