Background: Women aged ≥65 years have the highest age-specific rates of breast cancer incidence in the UK. However, national audit results demonstrate that the rates of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction offered to and performed on this age group are considerably lower than in younger women (Jeevan, 2009). This discrepancy may arise from unsubstantiated concerns over greater medical and surgical risk in older patients (James, 2015). In the present study, the first of its kind in the UK, we sought to evaluate potential differences in postoperative complications following autologous breast reconstruction between young and older patient populations.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 59 patients (31 'younger' <65 years; 28 'older' ≥65 years) who underwent autologous breast reconstruction at Oxford University Hospitals, between 2008 and 2017. Clinical, operative, and outcome variables were compared across the two age groups. To examine the complete multi-stage process of breast reconstruction as a whole, we also compared rates of uptake of multiple secondary reconstructive and revisional procedures across age groups.
Key results: Major surgical, minor surgical, and medical complication rates, as well as length of stay, did not differ significantly by age group. The scar revision rate (at the flap donor site) was higher in the <65 group (19.4% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.025). Otherwise, rates of secondary reconstructive and revisional procedures were comparable across both groups.
Conclusion: Patients aged ≥65 years were not at a significantly greater risk of complications following autologous breast reconstruction compared to younger patients. Chronological age, in itself, should not influence treatment decisions surrounding breast reconstruction.
Keywords: Autologous breast reconstruction; Complications; Elderly; Older; Secondary reconstructive procedures.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.