Academic benchmarks for leaders in Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery: a Canadian perspective

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May 6;49(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00419-4.

Abstract

Background: The present study summarizes the demographics, subspecialty training, and academic productivity of contemporary leaders in Canadian Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery (OHNS) training programs across Canada.

Methods: Demographic data regarding chairpersons (CPs) and program directors (PDs) were obtained from publicly-available faculty listings and online sources, and included employment institution, residency training, fellowship training status, gender, and years of post-graduate experience. Research productivity was measured using the h-index and number of publications, obtained from Scopus. Characteristics of CPs and PDs were compared using statistical analysis.

Results: Cross-sectional data was obtained from a total of 27 CPs and PDs from 13 accredited OHNS training programs across Canada active on July 1, 2019. All academic leaders completed at least 1 year of fellowship training. Head and neck oncology represented 77% of CPs and 59% of academic leaders overall, while pediatric otolaryngology represented 43% of PDs. Females represented 11% of academic leaders. There was a significant association between location of residency training and employment, with 56% (15/27) of physicians working where they had trained (p = 0.001, Fisher's exact test; φ = 2.63, p = 0.001). On average, individuals with a graduate (Master's) degree had a significantly higher H-index (17.7 vs 7.4, p = 0.001) and greater number of publications (106 vs. 52, p = 0.02). Compared to PDs, CPs had a significantly higher average h-index score (14.5 vs. 8.14, p = 0.04) and accrued more years of post-graduate experience (29.7 vs. 21.3 years, p = 0.008). There were no differences in the proportions of CPs and PDs with graduate degrees. There appeared to be a decline in research productivity beginning 3 years after academic appointment.

Conclusions: This cross-sectional overview of academic leaders in Canadian OHNS programs demonstrates the following key findings: 1) all leaders completed fellowship training; 2) head and neck surgical oncology was the most common fellowship training subspecialty; 3) leaders were likely to be employed at the institution where they trained; 4) a Master's degree may be associated with increased research productivity; 5) there is a potential risk of decreased productivity after appointment to a leadership position; and 6) women are underrepresented in academic leadership roles.

Keywords: Academic benchmark; Gender; H-index; Head & neck surgery; Leadership; Otolaryngology; Research productivity.

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Education, Medical, Graduate / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leadership
  • Male
  • Otolaryngologists / statistics & numerical data*
  • Otolaryngology / education
  • Otolaryngology / organization & administration*
  • Otolaryngology / statistics & numerical data
  • Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures / education*
  • Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures / statistics & numerical data