Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional radiologic evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting of clefts: a systematic review

Abstract

Objective: Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) has become the principal means of treating alveolar cleft defects. We reviewed the literature on 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-dimensional (3-D) radiographic evaluation of SABG in patients with cleft lip and alveolus (CLA) and those with cleft lip and palate (CLP), with a focus on outcomes.

Study design: We searched several electronic databases to the end of 2018. The inclusion criteria were nonsyndromic CLA or CLP treated with SABG at an optimal age and evaluation performed no earlier than 3 months postoperatively. Study quality was evaluated by using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies and the Cochrane Collaboration tool.

Results: We identified 282 articles from 3 databases. Full texts of 102 articles were analyzed, and finally 11 articles were included for qualitative analysis. 2-D and 3-D radiographic evaluations were performed in each study. Traditional 2-D radiographic imaging tended to overestimate success; bone resorption in the labiopalatal direction was inaccurate in 2-D views. Most articles were observational in nature and of moderate methodologic quality.

Conclusions: 2-D evaluation tended to overestimate SABG outcomes; 3-D evaluation was more precise and reliable than 2-D radiography. A gold standard 3-D evaluation protocol is required for quantitative comparisons in the future.