A circular mapping catheter is not mandatory for isolating pulmonary veins during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with radiofrequency

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) with the use of an ablation catheter only (non-CMC group) by retrospectively comparing its procedural success and recurrence rates at 1 year to ablation performed with the help of a circular mapping catheter (CMC group).

Methods: We compared the success and recurrence rates between 226 patients and 251 patients who underwent index ablation with and without the use of CMC, respectively.

Results: Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) episodes > 30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period. There was no significant difference between the number of pulmonary vein isolations, recurrence rate of AF/AT, and the use of antiarrhythmic drugs after 1 year of ablation. The procedure and fluoroscopy times were lower in the non-CMC group compared with the CMC group (106 ± 33 vs. 125 ± 32 min, p < 0.0001; 2.2 ± 1.9 vs. 2.7 ± 2.3 min, p = 0.0002, respectively).

Conclusions: Pulmonary vein isolation without the use of a CMC is feasible; moreover, the material costs, procedure time, and radiation exposure were reduced compared with the CMC group. Freedom of recurrence was similar between groups. Optimized use of 3D electro-anatomical mapping systems could reduce the radiation exposure for both the patient and physician.

Keywords: 3D mapping; Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Circular mapping catheter; Swing-fall technique.