Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects the upper and lower motor neurons. Currently, the only treatment for ALS is riluzole, which only has a limited effect on increasing survival from 3 to 6 months. New therapies are needed in the clinical setting for ALS. We aim to compare and contrast the clinical trials of edaravone and the post-marketing experience of the drug during this study. For the method, a search strategy was made using PubMed with the search terms "Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis" (MeSH) and "Edaravone" (MeSH). For inclusion criteria, we used full papers, studies involving humans, and studies published in the English language. We exclude meta-analyses, literature reviews, systematic reviews, studies involving animals, and studies not published in English. After close examination, 20 papers were used for the discussion in this review. The clinical trials showed efficacy in patients in reducing the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) in patients with early ALS with selective criteria. We documented edaravone's post-marketing experience in six countries: Kuwait, South Korea, Argentina, United States, Israel, and Italy. During the study we analyzed, the forced vital capacity (FVC) and ALSFRS-R scored, together with edaravone's safety in the clinical trials and post-marketing experience. Edaravone seems to be more effective in Asia, where the ALSFRS-R scores and the FVC decline were similar to the clinical trial results in Japan. Studies in Europe did not find the drug clinically useful. At the same time, studies in United States and Argentina were mainly descriptive, so more information is needed to evaluate the drug's efficacy in that part of the world. The drug was well-tolerated in all studies. In conclusion, more studies need to be done worldwide to carry out and clarify the effectiveness of edaravone in the clinical setting.
Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; edaravone..
Copyright © 2020, Ortiz et al.