The safety and effectiveness of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula as an initial ventilation method in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e23243. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023243.

Abstract

Background: This study uses a method of systematic evaluation to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) as an initial ventilation method in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) scientifically. In the field of evidence-based medicine, this study provides a theoretical reference and basis for choosing appropriate initial non-invasive ventilation methods in the treatment of NRDS, thereby providing assistance for clinical treatment.

Methods: The main electronic network databases were searched by computer, including 4 Chinese databases: CNKI, WangFang Data, CQVIP, SinoMed and 3 English databases: PubMed, The Cochrane Library and EMBASE, the time range of retrieval from the beginning of each database to September 1, 2020. The content involves all the published randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of HHHFNC compared with NCPAP as an initial ventilation method in the treatment of NRDS. Using a search method that combines medical subject words and free words. Based on the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool, 2 researchers independently screen the literature, and then extract the data we needed in the literature, and cross-check. If it is difficult to decide whether to include literature, then turning to a third researcher for help and making a final decision after discussion, and using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 13.0 to analyze the relative data.

Results: Based on the method of meta-analysis, this study analyzes the pre-determined outcome indicators through scientific statistical analysis, and compares the effectiveness and safety of HHHFNC compared with NCPAP as an initial ventilation method in the treatment of NRDS. All results will be published in peer-reviewed high-quality professional academic journals.

Conclusion: Based on evidence-based medicine, this study will obtain the establishing evidence of comparison that the clinical effectiveness and safety of HHHFNC compared with NCPAP as an initial ventilation method in the treatment of NRDS through the existing data and data, which provides the evidence support of evidence-based medicine in the treatment of NRDS.

Osf registration number: September 17, 2020. osf.io/f6at4 (https://osf.io/f6at4).

MeSH terms

  • Cannula / standards*
  • Clinical Protocols*
  • Humans
  • Humidifiers / standards*
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Noninvasive Ventilation / methods
  • Noninvasive Ventilation / standards
  • Oxygen / administration & dosage
  • Oxygen / therapeutic use
  • Oxygen Inhalation Therapy / methods*
  • Oxygen Inhalation Therapy / standards
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn / drug therapy*
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic

Substances

  • Oxygen