Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among LAMA/LABA combinations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Respir Res. 2020 Nov 25;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01540-8.

Abstract

Background: Only few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for head-to-head comparison have been conducted between various combinations of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs). Our study was conducted to compare acute exacerbation and all-cause mortality among different LAMA/LABA regimens using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods: We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library (search date: July 1, 2019). We included parallel-group RCTs comparing LAMA/LABA combinations with other inhaled drugs in the stable COPD for ≥ 48 weeks. Two different network geometries were used. The geometry of network (A) had nodes of individual drugs or their combination, while that of network (B) combined all other treatments except LAMA/LABA into each drug class. This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO; CRD42019126753.

Results: We included 16 RCTs involving a total of 39,065 patients with stable COPD. Six combinations of LAMA/LABA were identified: tiotropium/salmeterol, glycopyrrolate/indacaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol, tiotropium/olodaterol, aclidinium/formoterol, and glycopyrrolate/formoterol. We found that umeclidinium/vilanterol was associated with a lower risk of total exacerbations than other LAMA/LABAs in the NMA using network (A) (level of evidence: low or moderate). However, the significant differences were not present in the NMA of network (B). There were no significant differences among the LAMA/LABA combinations in terms of the number of moderate to severe exacerbations, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or pneumonia.

Conclusions: The present NMA including all available RCTs provided that there is no strong evidence suggesting different benefits among LAMA/LABAs in patients with stable COPD who have been followed up for 48 weeks or more.

Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO; CRD42019126753.

Keywords: Administration; Bayes theorem; Chronic obstructive; Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; Inhalation; Mortality; Network meta-analysis; Pulmonary disease; Respiratory therapy; Symptom flare-up.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists / administration & dosage*
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Bronchodilator Agents / administration & dosage
  • Delayed-Action Preparations / administration & dosage
  • Disease Progression
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Mortality / trends
  • Muscarinic Antagonists / administration & dosage*
  • Network Meta-Analysis*
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / diagnosis
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / drug therapy*
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / mortality*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods*

Substances

  • Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
  • Bronchodilator Agents
  • Delayed-Action Preparations
  • Muscarinic Antagonists