Stroke Recognition for First Aid Providers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Daniel Meyran; Pascal Cassan; Bert Avau; Eunice Singletary; David A Zideman

doi:10.7759/cureus.11386

Stroke Recognition for First Aid Providers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cureus. 2020 Nov 8;12(11):e11386. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11386.

Authors

Daniel Meyran^{1

2}, Pascal Cassan³, Bert Avau⁴, Eunice Singletary⁵, David A Zideman⁶

Affiliations

¹ Healthcare Division, French Red Cross, Paris, FRA.
² Prehospital Emergency Care, Bataillon De Marins Pompiers De Marseille, Marseille, FRA.
³ International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Global First Aid Reference Center, French Red Cross, Paris, FRA.
⁴ Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Rode Kruis-Vlaanderen, Mechelen, BEL.
⁵ Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
⁶ Pre-Hospital Emergency Medicine, Thames Valley Air Ambulance, Oxford, GBR.

Abstract

Aim To perform a systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of existing stroke recognition scales used in a prehospital setting and suitable for use by first aid providers. The systematic review will be used to inform an update of international first aid guidelines. Methods We followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions methodology and report results according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched Medline, Embase and CENTRAL on May 25, 2020 for studies of stroke recognition scales used by first aid providers, paramedics and nurses for adults with suspected acute stroke in a prehospital setting. Outcomes included change in time to treatment, initial recognition of stroke, survival and discharge with favorable neurologic status, and increased layperson recognition of the signs of stroke. Two investigators reviewed abstracts, extracted and assessed the data for risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE methodology. Results We included 24 observational studies with 10,446 patients evaluating 10 stroke scales (SS). All evidence was of moderate to very low certainty. Use of the Kurashiki Prehospital SS (KPSS), Ontario Prehospital SS (OPSS) and Face Arm Speech Time SS (FAST) was associated with an increased number of suspected stroke patients arriving to a hospital within three hours and, for OPSS, a higher rate of thrombolytic therapy. The KPSS was associated with a decreased time from symptom onset to hospital arrival. Use of FAST Emergency Response (FASTER) was associated with decreased time from door to tomography and from symptom onset to treatment. The Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Scale (LAPSS) was associated with an increased number of correct initial diagnoses. Meta-analysis found the summary estimate sensitivity of four scales ranged from 0.78 to 0.86. The FAST and Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) were found to have a summary estimated sensitivity of 0.86, 95% CI [0.69-0.94] and 0.81, 95% CI [0.70-0.89], respectively. Conclusion Stroke recognition scales used in the prehospital first aid setting improves the recognition and diagnosis of stroke, thereby aiding the emergency services to triage stroke victims directly down an appropriate stroke care pathway. Of those prehospital scales evaluated by more than a single study, FAST and Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen (MASS) were found to be the most sensitive for stroke recognition, while the CPSS had higher specificity. When blood glucose cannot be measured, the simplicity of FAST and CPSS makes these particular stroke scales appropriate for non-medical first aid providers.

Keywords: first aid; prehospital; recognition scale; score; stroke; triage.

Grants and funding

Funding for the submission fees to CUREUS.COM was provided by the French Red Cross and the Global First Aid Reference Center. No other funding was requested or required for this review.