Introduction: The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic comparison of the incidence of late and extremely late stent thrombosis (ST) with short-term and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after a second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials using short-term and long-term DAPT and reporting late ST (30 days-1 year) and extremely late ST (longer than 1 year) after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES were searched and compared in the Life Sciences and Biomedical Information Bibliographic Database (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.com. ST was used as the primary endpoint of the therapeutic outcome, and the fixed-effects model (I2 < 50%) or random-effects model (I2 ≥ 50%) was adopted for the combined analysis. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used to represent the results. P < 0.05 in the combined result indicated that the difference was statistically significant.
Results: A total of five randomized controlled trials consisting of 7142 patients were included, with 3556 cases of short-term DAPT (at most 6 months), and 3586 cases of long-term DAPT (at least 12 months). There was no significant difference between late ST and administration duration of DAPT (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.30-3.18; P = 0.97, I2 = 0%). There was also no significant difference between the incidence of extremely late ST and the duration of DAPT application (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.03-2.95; P = 0.31).
Conclusion: The duration of continuous DAPT application had no effect on the occurrence of late and extremely late ST.
Keywords: Coronary angioplasty; Dual antiplatelet therapy; Late stent thrombosis; Meta-analysis; Second-generation drug-eluting stent.