Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review

Reem Saleem Malouf; Claire Tomlinson; Jane Henderson; Charles Opondo; Peter Brocklehurst; Fiona Alderdice; Angaja Phalguni; Janine Dretzke

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036852

Impact of obstetric unit closures, travel time and distance to obstetric services on maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review

BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):e036852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036852.

Authors

Reem Saleem Malouf¹, Claire Tomlinson², Jane Henderson³, Charles Opondo³, Peter Brocklehurst³, Fiona Alderdice³, Angaja Phalguni², Janine Dretzke²

Affiliations

¹ Nuffield Department of Population Health, Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK reem.malouf@npeu.ox.ac.uk.
² Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
³ Nuffield Department of Population Health, Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review (1) The effect of obstetric unit (OU) closures on maternal and neonatal outcomes and (2) The association between travel distance/time to an OU and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Design: Systematic review of any quantitative studies with a comparison group.

Data sources: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Applied Social Science Index and Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health and grey literature were searched.

Methods: Eligible studies explored the impact of closure of an OU or the effect of travel distance/time on prespecified maternal or neonatal outcomes. Only studies of women giving birth in high-income countries with universal health coverage of maternity services comparable to the UK were included. Identification of studies, extraction of data and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by at least two reviewers independently. The risk of bias checklist was based on the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care criteria and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis and synthesis was narrative, with key findings tabulated.

Results: 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was some evidence to suggest an increase in babies born before arrival following OU closures and/or associated with longer travel distances or time. This may be associated with an increased risk of perinatal or neonatal mortality, but this finding was not consistent across studies. Evidence on other maternal and neonatal outcomes was limited but did not suggest worse outcomes after closures or with longer travel times/distances. Interpretation of findings for some studies was hampered by concerns around how accurately exposures were measured, and/or a lack of adjustment for confounders or temporal changes.

Conclusion: It is not possible to conclude from this review whether OU closure, increased travel distances or times are associated with worse outcomes for the mother or the baby.

Prospero registration number: CRD42017078503.

Keywords: epidemiology; obstetrics; public health.

Publication types

Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review

MeSH terms

Developed Countries
Female
Humans
Income*
Infant
Infant Mortality*
Infant, Newborn
Pregnancy