Background: The fit of implant-supported prostheses is of prime importance for the long-term success of implant therapy.
Purpose: This systematic review aimed to evaluate recent evidence on current techniques for assessing implant-framework misfit, its associated strain/stress, and whether these misfits are related to mechanical, biological, and clinical consequences.
Materials and methods: An electronic search for publications from January 2010 to October 2020 was performed using the Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases with combined keywords on implant-framework misfit assessments and related clinical complications. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. After full-text analyses, data extraction was implemented on current techniques of misfit assessment and the relationship between the misfit and the induced strain/stress.
Results: A total of 3 in vivo and 92 in vitro studies were selected, including 47 studies on quantifying the degree of implant-framework misfit with dimensional techniques, 24 studies measuring misfit-induced strain/stress with modeling techniques, and 24 studies using both methods. The technical details, advantages, and limitations of each technique were illustrated. The correlation between the implant-framework misfit and the induced strain/stress has been revealed in vitro, while that with the biological complications and implant/prostheses failure was weak in clinical studies.
Conclusions: Dimensional and modeling techniques are available to measure the implant-framework misfit. The passivity of implant-supported fixed prostheses appeared related to the induced strain/stress, but not the clinical complications. Further studies combining three-dimensional (3D) assessments using dimensional and modeling techniques was needed.
Keywords: dimensional assessments; implant framework; misfit; modeling assessments; strain; stress; three dimensional.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.