The protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) against liver ischemia-reperfusion injury caused by hepatectomy remains controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RIPC strategies. PubMed, SinoMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that assessed the effectiveness and safety of RIPC strategies. The primary outcomes were operation time, index of liver function on postoperative day (POD) 1, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. The pooled odds ratios and weighted mean differences at 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. A total of 459 patients were included in seven RCTs. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alanine aminotransferase (AST) values on POD1 were significantly different between the RIPC group and the N-RIPC group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.02, respectively). However, the heterogeneity was significant (I2 = 84% and I2 = 86%), and the results of a sensitivity analysis were unstable. There was no significant difference in the total bilirubin levels (P = 0.25) between the two groups on POD1. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the AST and ALT levels on POD1 between the RIIPC group and the N-RIPC group, regardless of whether the vascular control technique was used (all P > 0.05). Based on current evidence, RIPC does not alleviate liver injury caused by IRI after hepatectomy.
Keywords: Hepatectomy; Liver injury; Meta-analysis; Remote ischemic preconditioning.
© 2021. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.