The concept of functional movement disorders has evolved considerably over the past few decades. More specifically, the views on the relation with psychological stressors or personality disorders have substantially changed, emphasizing a shift from the previously dominant dualistic scheme. This evolution is reflected in adaptations to diagnostic criteria and management approaches. Functional movement disorders which arise in a close temporal relationship with a peripheral trauma are specifically challenging with respect to diagnosis and treatment, but similar considerations seem to apply. The relationship of functional disorders with trauma appears to be much closer than is often thought. Clinical and pathophysiological research has identified shared factors underlying functional posttraumatic as well as primary movement disorders. These evolving insights impact on discussions in terms of litigation for compensation after trauma. The literature is reviewed and the consequences for argumentation in litigation are outlined, including ethical and legal considerations. Finally, we formulate a number of recommendations.
Keywords: Ethics; Functional movement disorder; Litigation; Posttraumatic disorder.